Monroe Local School District
Bylaws & Policies
 

1530 - EVALUATION OF PRINCIPALS AND OTHER ADMINISTRATORS

Application

This policy shall apply to all persons employed by the Board of Education in a position requiring licensure as an administrator. This definition excludes school counselors but includes professional pupil services personnel and administrative specialists (or equivalent positions) who spend less than fifty percent (50%) of their time teaching or otherwise working directly in the presence of students.

This policy shall also apply to all persons employed in positions not requiring administrative licensure, but whose job duties enable them to be considered either a "supervisor" or "management level employee" as defined in R.C. 4117.01.

Procedures

General Requirements

The Superintendent shall implement a program of regular evaluation for all administrative personnel which includes the following elements:

 

A.

The evaluation process shall fairly attempt to measure the administrator's effectiveness in performing the duties set forth in his/her job description.

   
 

B.

A written evaluation document shall be produced for each evaluation. Each administrator shall be evaluated at least once annually.

   
 

C.

The evaluation shall be conducted by the Superintendent or his/her designee (such designation may be oral or in writing) prior to the Board's consideration of contract renewal or non-renewal, the Superintendent shall review the results of the evaluation process with the Board.

Specific Requirements for Building Principals and Assistant Principals

In addition to the above, procedures for the evaluation of District building principals and assistant principals will be based upon comparable standards as set forth in the policy adopted by the Board for the evaluation of teachers pursuant to R.C. 3319.111, which adopts the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES) but tailored to address the duties and responsibilities of building principals and assistant principals and the environment in which they work. The Superintendent is authorized to develop administrative guidelines for the procedural and substantive evaluation of building principals and assistant principals consistent with this policy and State law and is further authorized to access the Ohio Principal Evaluation System (OPES) model as a resource in the development and maintenance of an evaluation process which is weighted equally on student growth measures and performance on the standards of the profession for principals and assistant principals.

Evaluation Instruments

The Superintendent may, in his/her discretion, utilize a single evaluation instrument for all administrative positions, instruments particularized for each position, or a combination of both types of instruments.

Evaluation instruments shall be developed and/or utilized by the Superintendent as s/he may determine in his/her best professional judgment and may be modified from time-to-time by the Superintendent in the exercise of such professional judgment. Specific Board approval of the evaluation instruments or modifications to such instruments shall not be required.

Basis for Evaluation

Each evaluation shall fairly attempt to measure the administrator's effectiveness in performing the duties of his/her job description.

Evaluations may be based upon the direct formal observations of the administrator, but may also consider informal or incidental observations and other relevant information which is within the knowledge of or brought to the attention of the evaluator. Out-of-school conduct may be considered if such conduct impairs the individual's effectiveness as an administrator or as a role model for students and staff.

Observations and Conferences

A pre-evaluation conference may be conducted if deemed necessary or advisable by the evaluator.

Formal observations may be made of the administrator, either announced or unannounced, but shall not be a required element of the evaluation process except for principals and assistant principals, who are subject to OPES. Whether formal observations are deemed appropriate to other administrative positions shall be determined by the evaluator on a case-by-case basis.

Following any formal observations and/or gathering of other evaluative data, and before finalizing any evaluation report, the evaluator shall arrange a post-evaluation conference at which the results of the evaluation process are discussed with the administrator. To the extent that any weaknesses or deficiencies have been identified in the evaluation process, the evaluator shall offer suggestions for improvement. Identified weaknesses and suggestions for improvement shall be identified in the evaluation report, but shall not be a required element of any evaluation. However, for principals and assistant principals, the requirements of OPES shall apply in determining the need for growth and/or improvement plans.

A final written evaluation report shall be produced in a manner deemed appropriate by the evaluator, in consultation with the administrator. This evaluation report may be combined with the evaluation instruments, or may be a separate document. The evaluation report shall be signed and dated by the administrator and the evaluator at the conclusion of the post-evaluation conference. The signature of the administrator shall not necessarily indicate that s/he agrees with the evaluator's comments or conclusions, but only that s/he has been made aware of such comments or conclusions. A copy of the evaluation report shall be provided to the administrator.

The final evaluation report for an administrator in the last year of his/her contract shall include the Superintendent's intended recommendation to the Board concerning the renewal or non-renewal of the contract.

Number and Timing of Evaluations

 

A.

Administrator Not in Final Year of Contract

   
 

An administrator not in the final year of his/her contract shall be evaluated at least once during the school year. A written copy of the evaluation report shall be provided to the administrator no later than the end of the administrator's contract year as defined by the administrator's annual salary notice.

   
 

B.

Administrator in Final Year of Contract

   
 

An administrator whose contract is due to expire at the conclusion of the current school year shall have at least one (1) preliminary evaluation and one (1) final evaluation during such year. A written copy of the preliminary evaluation report shall be provided to the administrator at least sixty (60) days prior to any Board action on the renewal or non-renewal of the contract. A written copy of the final evaluation report shall be provided to the administrator at least five (5) days prior to any Board action on the renewal or non-renewal of the contract.

Meeting with Board

Each administrator shall be provided the opportunity to meet with the Board in executive session prior to the Board's action on his/her contract. In this meeting, the Board shall discuss its reasons for considering the renewal or non-renewal of the contract. The administrator may be accompanied by a representative of his/her choosing at the meeting. However, no witnesses or other persons may appear with or on behalf of the administrator without the express permission of the Board.

Written notice of the right to have such a meeting with the Board shall be provided in accordance with law to each administrator whose contract is expiring at the conclusion of the current school year.

Written Rebuttal

The administrator may, at any time following the receipt of an evaluation report, submit a written rebuttal, not to exceed three (3) pages in length, which shall be promptly attached to the evaluation report and any copies of the evaluation report which are retained in the District's records or submitted to the Board for its consideration.

Legal Effect

This policy and the procedures contained herein shall not create a legal expectancy of continued employment or a property interest in continued employment, and shall not be deemed a part of any individual administrator's contract or otherwise a contractual obligation of the Board.

To the extent that any of the procedures contained herein exceed the requirements of Ohio law, such procedures shall not be construed as a pre-condition to contract non-renewal and shall not prevent the Board from proceeding with a contract non-renewal which otherwise satisfies the minimum requirements of Ohio law.

R.C. 3319.02, 3319.111, 3319.112, 4117.01

Revised 5/29/12
Revised 6/24/13
Revised 9/15/14
Revised 11/16/15
Revised 1/9/17

© Neola 2016